![]() |
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
|
|
#1 |
|
WLC Lover
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 61
|
Hey Folks,
Why not have some dicsussion! What method do you use for fixing transparent PNGs in IE6. Personally I go for the css filter method. I find that while it's more laborious than a javascript fix, you don't get that flicker while the js loads the rendered images. Also with the CSS version you don't make non js users suffer. What are your opinions on this method, do you think that it's worth the extra work of hand writing all the filters to enable the small amount of non-js IE6ers to have the same experience? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i don't. if they aren't gonna update past ie6 they obviously aren't worried about any websites I would be designing
that's mostly because I'm lazy though, and pretty bad at what I do |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
WLC Lover
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 61
|
Unfortunately not all of us are in a position to ignore IE6
I am contracting at a LARGE corporation who's entire system is built on IE6. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
|
Yes, I think its worth it.
Being web developers isn't just creating a website and thinking its done. One should try one's best to get the best output. Laziness shouldn't be in a developer's/ designer's "to-do" list. I think creativity and perfection in every pixel is a must for all of us. So, I don't think I will have problem writing some code and making a website compatible and perfect in every browser. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 21
|
I remembered using a JQuery PNG fix such as this one http://jquery.andreaseberhard.de/pngFix/
What's a CSS Filter Method? Care to share? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
WLC Lover
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 68
|
I have heard about the CSS fix i just never looked into it. I would much perfer a CSS over JS becuase people are idiots and turn off JS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 7
|
I'm not sure that ignoring ie6 is just lazy. If a clinet has a limited budget, then I think its better to use the budget designing the site, not fixing bugs in out of date browsers. Depends on the target viewer I guess.
I would be interested in knowing more about the css fix if anyone could point me in the right direction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
WLC Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 22
|
http://www.komodomedia.com/blog/2007...ge-fix-for-ie/ - that's a link for the CSS-fix.
Personally I don't think it's good to run through any "fixes" or "hacks" or whatever. Most people use opacity in their images when they could just put their background beneath the image and save it without the opacity. There are also lower-quality (not horrible, just lower in quality) methods of saving PNGs that allow IE6 to still read its opacity. And this is what I'd use if I had to cater for CSS. However I think I'm fortunate enough in never having to work for someone with IE6 - I can just have Progressive Enhancement
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
WLC Mod
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 883
|
Using the js png-fix is industry standard. IE6 is officially deprecated per microsoft. If there is an existing site, pull stats on it to show the percentage of IE6 users. It will be minuscule at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 8
|
we use iepngfix.htc file and a script file where we can even solve this issue for background images too...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode |
|
|